The Horse is Not a Machine: Rethinking Tradition in the Age of Golden Tempo
When Cherie DeVaux, the trailblazing trainer behind Kentucky Derby winner Golden Tempo, announced her decision to skip the Preakness Stakes, the backlash was swift. Fans cried foul, critics questioned her strategy, and the Triple Crown purists were up in arms. But DeVaux’s response? ‘The horse is not a machine.’
Personally, I think this statement is more than just a defense—it’s a wake-up call. In a sport where tradition often trumps logic, DeVaux is challenging us to rethink what we owe these incredible animals. Let’s break this down.
The Pressure of Tradition vs. the Welfare of the Horse
One thing that immediately stands out is how DeVaux’s decision highlights the tension between tradition and modernity in horse racing. The Triple Crown is a sacred trifecta, a test of speed, stamina, and grit. But what happens when that test risks the long-term health of the horse?
From my perspective, DeVaux’s choice to prioritize Golden Tempo’s well-being over the Triple Crown chase is both bold and necessary. Horses aren’t cars; they can’t be tuned up and raced back-to-back without consequence. What many people don’t realize is that the physical toll of these races can be immense, especially for a horse as young as Golden Tempo.
This raises a deeper question: Are we asking too much of these animals in the name of tradition? DeVaux’s decision forces us to confront the ethical implications of pushing horses to their limits for our entertainment.
The Unfair Criticism: Why DeVaux is Right
DeVaux has faced her fair share of criticism, with some accusing her of undermining the sport’s integrity. But here’s where I think she’s spot on: ‘Why enter the Derby if you’re not going to run the Triple Crown?’ is a fundamentally flawed question.
What this really suggests is that we’ve conflated the Triple Crown with the ultimate measure of success in horse racing. But if you take a step back and think about it, the Derby is just one race—a prestigious one, yes, but not the be-all and end-all. DeVaux’s focus on Golden Tempo’s long-term career is a refreshing reminder that there’s more to racing than a single series of events.
A detail that I find especially interesting is how DeVaux’s critics seem to forget that she’s not just a trainer—she’s a pioneer. As the first woman to win the Kentucky Derby, she’s already shattered glass ceilings. Her decision to skip the Preakness isn’t a lack of commitment; it’s a testament to her commitment to her horse.
The Bigger Picture: Beyond the Triple Crown
DeVaux’s emphasis on the ‘bigger picture’ is something I find particularly fascinating. While the Triple Crown is a historic achievement, it’s not the only path to greatness. Golden Tempo’s career could span years, not just weeks.
In my opinion, DeVaux’s approach is a masterclass in long-term thinking. By skipping the Preakness, she’s ensuring Golden Tempo stays healthy and competitive for future races, including the Belmont Stakes. What many people don’t realize is that this year’s Triple Crown isn’t even the traditional layout—with the Preakness at Laurel and the Belmont at Saratoga, it’s already a departure from history.
This raises another point: Are we clinging to tradition for tradition’s sake, even when circumstances change? DeVaux’s willingness to adapt is a lesson for the entire sport.
The Human Behind the Horse
What makes DeVaux’s story particularly compelling is her humanity. She’s not just a trainer; she’s a woman navigating a male-dominated industry, making tough decisions under intense scrutiny. Her frustration with the criticism is palpable: ‘They’re not in my position to train the horse, and so therefore their opinion doesn’t matter to me.’
Personally, I think this is a powerful reminder of the pressure women in sports often face. DeVaux isn’t just defending her decision—she’s asserting her authority as a leader in her field. Her journey is a testament to resilience, and her choices reflect a deep understanding of her craft.
The Future of Horse Racing
DeVaux’s decision could be a turning point for the sport. If more trainers follow her lead, we might see a shift toward prioritizing horse welfare over tradition. This isn’t just about Golden Tempo—it’s about setting a new standard for how we treat these magnificent animals.
If you take a step back and think about it, DeVaux is essentially asking us to redefine success in horse racing. Is it about winning the Triple Crown, or is it about nurturing a champion over years, not weeks?
Final Thoughts
Cherie DeVaux’s decision to skip the Preakness is more than just a strategic move—it’s a statement. It challenges us to question our assumptions, prioritize ethics, and embrace change. As she aptly put it, ‘The horse is not a machine.’
In my opinion, DeVaux isn’t just training a horse; she’s shaping the future of the sport. And for that, she deserves not just our respect, but our applause.
